Go to S Systems, Inc. Home Page

John M. Strawn, Ph.D.

Expert Witness and Litigation Support Experience

Summary: patent litigation, class action litigation, ITC actions, and USPTO declarations relating to software (in a wide variety of areas), audio, music, speech, processor architecture, compression, multimedia, digital cameras, telephony, cell phones, video games, and file downloading, among others. Testimony at trial, prior art analysis, infringement analysis, expert reports, deposition, tutorials, Markman hearings.

Date:

2011 -
present

Quinn Emanuel, New York
 

Case:

Motorola v. Apple (Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers and Components Thereof, ITC 337-TA-745).

 

Project:

Expert reports relating to Apple Accused Products (iPhones), technical prong of domestic industry, and non-invalidity, focusing on cell phone GPS. Source code analysis. Deposition. Scheduled to testify at trial.

Date:

2010 -
present

Quinn Emanuel, San Francisco
 

Case:

Motorola v. Apple, Florida Southern District, 1:2010cv23580.

 

Project:

Undisclosed.

Date:

2008 -
2009, 2011-
present

Alston Bird, Atlanta
 

Case

Move Inc. v. Real Estate Alliance Ltd et al., 2:07-cv-02185, Central District of California, Los Angeles.

 

Project:

Expert reports concerning real estate sales website. Source code analysis. Deposition. Scheduled to testify at trial.

Date:

2010 -
2011

Finnegan, Henderson, Washington, DC
 

Case:

HTC v. Apple (In the Matter of Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software, ITC 337-TA-721).

 

Project:

Expert reports relating to technical prong of domestic industry for 24 HTC Windows Mobile cell phones, including source code analysis relating to user interface, memory, and caller ID. Consulting expert relating to iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch concerning invalidity and power management.

Date:

2010 -
present

Robins, Kaplan, Miller, & Ciresi, Minneapolis
 

Case:

Fair Isaac v. Actimize and NICE, 1:2009cv00688, Delaware.

 

Project:

Infringement and source code analysis relating to financial transaction verification.

Date:

2010 -
present

Orrick, Washington, DC
 

Case:

Affinity Labs v. Alpine Electronics, JVC Kenwood, et al., 08-171-RC, Eastern District Texas.

 

Project:

Involved car audio, marine audio, and home theatre products that connect to iPod/iPhone. Rebuttal expert report on non-infringement. Deposition.

Date:

2009 -
present

Wolf Haldenstein, New York
 

Case:

In re Apple & ATTM Antitrust Litigation, Northern District of California, San Jose, C 07-5152.

 

Project:

Analyze iPhone source code for antitrust plaintiffs. Expert report and various declarations, in particular regarding class certification. Deposition.

Date:

2008 -
present

Paul Hastings, Palo Alto, CA
 

Case:

Konami Digital Entertainment v. Harmonix Music Systems, Texas Eastern District 6:08-cv-00286.

 

Project:

Analyze Rock Band video game source code (Playstation 2, PS3, Wii, XBox). Expert reports. Two-day deposition.

Date:

2009 - 2010

Jones Day, Palo Alto, CA
 

Case:

SanDisk v. LSI, California Northern District, 3:09-cv-02737.

 

Project:

Attend tutorial and Markman hearing regarding MP3 patent litigation.

Date:

2009

Weil Gotschal, Redwood Shores, CA
 

Case:

Samsung v. Kodak (In the Matter of Certain Digital Cameras, ITC 337-TA-671).

 

Project:

Analyze Samsung cell phone source code relating to digital cameras. This involved baseband chips from Qualcomm, Philips, Agere, Texas Instruments; register-level code for camera image sensors from Samsung, Sony, Micron, Omnivision; Windows Mobile 5 and 6 digital camera device drivers; Qualcomm BREW 2 and BREW 3 cell phone operating systems; patents involving digital cameras, Bayer subsampling, and pixel interpolation; and standard digital optical concepts such as RGB, YUV, YCbCr, EXIF, and JPEG.

Date:

2009

Finnegan, Henderson, Washington, DC
 

Case

Voice Domain Technologies LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Inc. et al., Western District of Oklahoma, 5:08-cv-00701.

 

Project:

Declarations for Markman hearing on hand-held consumer devices.

Date:

2009

THAT Corporation, represented by McDermott Will & Emery, Boston
 

Case

US Patent Application 09/638,245, BTSC Encoder.

 

Project:

Declaration to USPTO regarding non-obviousness for audio in television.

Date:

2007 - 2008

Fish and Richardson, Atlanta
 

Case

Nice Systems Inc. and Nice Systems Ltd. v. Witness Systems Inc. Civil Action No. 06-311-JJF, Delaware District.

 

Project:

Expert reports concerning telephone call centers (telephony, software, hardware architecture, digital recording). Deposition, jury trial testimony.

Date:

2005 - 2007

Fish and Richardson, San Diego
 

Case

Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc., et al., and Microsoft Corporation, Intervener. Case No. 02-CV-2060 B (CAB) consolidated with 03-CV-0699 B (CAB) and 03-CV-1108 B (CAB).

 

Project:

Testifying expert for Microsoft (defendant) involving audio compression and MP3. Prepared 7 expert reports (total 497 pages) on non-infringement and invalidity including 20 claim charts and 15 other substantive attachments. Analyzed over 4000 pages of C/C++ source code; analysis of assembly and machine code. Worked directly with German documents. Deposed, November 3 2006. Two days testimony at three-week jury trial, February 7-8, 2007. Wikipedia entry on this case.

 

Status:

Judge Brewster overturned jury decision and ruled in favor of defense. Judge Brewster's decision upheld on appeal, September 2008.

Date:

2007

Morrison and Foerster, Los Angeles
 

Case

3:06-cv-7736 CA Northern District, Seer Systems v. Yamaha.

 

Project:

Prior art research for music synthesis.

Date:

2006 - 2007

Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, Houston, TX
 

Case

2:06-cv-156, Digital Technology Licensing (DTL) v. Cingular Wireless.

 

Project:

Claim charts, technology background for microphone in cell phones.

Date:

2007

Meyer and Associates Co. LPA, Columbus, Ohio
 

Case

Health Science Products LLC and Kairos & Associates, Inc., v. Sage Software SB, Inc.

 

Project:

For class action litigation, analyze database software before and after release of ACT 2005.

Date:

2005 - 2006

Black Lowe & Graham, Seattle
 

Case

Digeo, Inc. v. Audible, Inc., Case No. C05-00464-JLR, Seattle

 

Project:

Expert reports involving Internet file downloading. Analyze C/C++ source code. Deposed for Markman hearing.

Date:

2006

Ropes and Gray, Palo Alto
 

Case

MediaTek, ASUSTek & ASUS v. Sanyo.

 

Project:

Prepare claim charts on 24 hour notice. Assist in preparation of tutorial.                                           

Date:

2006

Wilmer Hale (New York)
 

Case

Information Technology Innovation, LLC v. Motorola, Inc. et al., Northern District of Illinois 04-C-7121.

 

Project:

Provide and supervise an expert witness colleague who prepared an expert report on infringement.

Date:

2004 - 2005

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York office
 

Case

Antor Media Corporation v. Apple Computer, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, RealNetworks, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:03CV320 (E.D. Texas 2004)

 

Project:

Prior art regarding file downloading.

Date:

2005

Trop, Pruner & Hu, Austin, TX
 

Project:

prior art involving signal processors.

Date:

2003

Robins, Kaplan, Miller, & Ciresi, Minneapolis
 

Case

Intergraph v. Dell et al., EDTX, 2-02cv-312

 

Project:

Prior art for hardware architecture, virtual memory and cache memory.

Date:

1997 - 1998

Cesari and McKenna, Boston
 

Case

Lucent (plaintiff) vs. Young Chang/Kurzweil.

 

Project:

Prior art for music synthesis, digital hardware, software, architecture.

Date:

1994

Small, Larkin, Los Angeles
 

Case

L.C. Concepts v. Digital Theatre Systems (DTS).

 

Project:

Prior art for cinema sound equipment in USA and Germany.

For more information on Dr. Strawn's background, see his on-line resume. For more information on his litigation support work, contact (Dr.) John Strawn .


Go to S Systems, Inc. Home Page Send Us E-Mail About